精選分類 書庫 完本 排行 原創專區
欣可小說 > 其他 > 資本論 > CHAPTER 10: THE WORKING DAY006

資本論 CHAPTER 10: THE WORKING DAY006

作者:(德)卡爾·馬克思 分類:其他 更新時間:2026-08-10 18:48:22

111p.

17,

l.c.

In

Mr.

Horner's

district

10,270

adult

male

labourers

were

thus

examined

in

181

factories.

Their

evidence

is

to

be

found

in

the

appendix

to

the

Factory

Reports

for

the

half-year

ending

October

1848.

These

examinations

furnish

valuable

material

in

other

connexions

also.

112l.c.

See

the

evidence

collected

by

Leonard

Horner

himself,

Nos.

69,

70,

71,

72,

92,

93,

and

that

collected

by

Sub

lnspector

A.,

Nos.

51,

52,

58,

59,

62,

70,

of

the

Appendix.

One

manufacturer,

too,

tells

the

plain

truth.

See

No.

14,

and

No.265,

l.c.

113Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1848,

pp.

133,

134.

114Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1848,

p.

47.

115Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1848,

p.

130.

116Reports,

&c.,

l.c.,

p.

142.

117Reports

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1850,

pp.

5,

6.

118The

nature

of

capital

remains

the

same

in

its

developed

as

in

its

undeveloped

form.

In

the

code

which

the

influence

of

the

slave-owners,

shortly

before

the

outbreak

of

the

American

Civil

War,

imposed

on

the

territory

of

New

Mexico,

it

is

said

that

the

labourer,

in

as

much

as

the

capitalist

has

bought

his

labour-power,

\"is

his

(the

capitalist's)

money.\"

The

same

view

was

current

among

the

Roman

patricians.

The

money

they

had

advanced

to

the

plebeian

debtor

had

been

transformed

via

the

means

of

subsistence

into

the

flesh

and

blood

of

the

debtor.This

\"flesh

and

blood\"

were,

therefore,

\"their

money.\"

Hence,the

Shylock-law

of

the

Ten

Tables.

Linguet's

hypothesis

that

the

patrician

creditors

from

time

to

time

prepared,

beyond

the

Tiber,

banquets

of

debtors'

flesh,

may

remain

as

undecided

as

that

of

Daumer

on

the

Christian

Eucharist.

119Reports,

&c..

for

30th

April,

1848,

p.

28.

120Thus,

among

others,

Philanthropist

Ashworth

to

Leonard

Horner,

in

a

disgusting

Quaker

letter.

(Reports,

&c.,

April,1849,

p.

4.)

121l.c.,

p.

140.

122Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1849,

pp.

21,

22.

Cf

like

examples

ibid.,

pp.

4,

5.

123By

I.

and

II.

Will.

IV.,

ch.

24,

s.

10,

known

as

Sir

John

Hobhouse's

Factory

Act,

it

was

forbidden

to

any

owner

of

a

cotton-spinning

or

weaving

mill,

or

the

father,

son,

or

brother

of

such

owner,

to

act

as

Justice

of

the

Peace

in

any

inquiries

that

concerned

the

Factory

Act.

124l.c.

125Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1849,

p.

5.

126Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1849,

p.

6.

127Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1849,

p.

21.

128Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1848,

p.

95.

129See

Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1849,

p.

6,

and

the

detailed

explanation

of

the

\"shifting

system,\"

by

Factory

Inspectors

Howell

and

Saunders,

in

\"Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1848.\"

See

also

the

petition

to

the

Queen

from

the

clergy

of

Ashton

and

vicinity,

in

the

spring

of

1849,

against

the\"shift

system.\"

130Cf.

for

example,

\"The

Factory

Question

and

the

Ten

Hours'

Bill.\",

By

R.

H.

Greg,

1837.

131F.

Engels:

\"The

English

Ten

Hours'

Bill.\"

(In

the

\"

NeueRheinische

Zeitung.

Politisch-oekonomische

Revue.\"

Edited

by

K.

Marx.

April

number,

1850,

p.

13.)

The

same

\"high\"

Court

of

Justice

discovered,

during

the

American

Civil

War,

a

verbal

ambiguity

which

exactly

reversed

the

meaning

of

the

law

against

the

arming

of

pirate

ships.

132Rep.,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1850.

133In

winter,

from

7

a.m.

to

7

p.m.

may

be

substituted.

134\"The

present

law

(of

1850)

was

a

compromise

whereby

the

employed

surrendered

the

benefit

of

the

Ten

Hours'

Act

for

the

advantage

of

one

uniform

period

for

the

commencement

and

termination

of

the

labour

of

those

whose

labour

is

restricted.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1852,

p.

14.)

135Reports,

&c.,

for

Sept.,

1844,

p.

13.

136l.c.

137l.c.

138\"Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

Oct.,

1846,\"

p.

20.

139Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

Oct.,

1861,

p.

26.

140l.c.,p.

27.

On

the

whole

the

working

population,

subject

to

the

Factory

Act,

has

greatly

improved

physically.

All

medical

testimony

agrees

on

this

point,

and

personal

observation

at

different

times

has

convinced

me

of

it.

Nevertheless,

and

exclusive

of

the

terrible

death-rate

of

children

in

the

first

years

of

their

life,

the

official

reports

of

Dr.

Greenhow

show

the

unfavourable

health

condition

of

the

manufacturing

districts

as

compared

with

\"agricultural

districts

of

normal

health.\"

As

evidence,

take

the

following

table

from

his

1861

report:

141It

is

well

known

with

what

reluctance

the

English

\"Free

traders\"

gave

up

the

protective

duty

on

the

silk

manufacture.Instead

of

the

protection

against

French

importation,

the

absence

of

protection

to

English

factory

children

now

serves

their

turn.

142During

1859

and

1860,

the

zenith

years

of

the

English

cotton

industry,

some

manufacturers

tried,

by

the

decoy

bait

of

higher

wages

for

over-time,

to

reconcile

the

adult

male

operatives

to

an

extension

of

the

working

day.

The

hand-mule

spinners

and

self-actor

mincers

put

an

end

to

the

experiment

by

a

petition

to

their

employers

in

which

they

say,

\"Plainly

speaking,

our

lives

are

to

us

a

burthen;

and,

while

we

are

confined

to

the

mills

nearly

two

days

a

week

more

than

the

other

operatives

of

the

country,

we

feel

like

helots

in

the

land,and

that

we

are

perpetuating

a

system

injurious

to

ourselves

and

future

generations....

This,

therefore,

is

to

give

you

most

respectful

notice

that

when

we

commence

work

again

after

the

Christmas

and

New

Year's

holidays,

we

shall

work

60

hours

per

week,

and

no

more,

or

from

six

to

six,

with

one

hour

and

a

half

out.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1860,

p.

30.)

143On

the

means

that

the

wording

of

this

Act

afforded

for

its

violation

of

the

Parliamentary

Return

\"Factories

Regulation

Act\"

(6th

August,

1859),

and

in

it

Leonard

Horner's\"Suggestions

for

amending

the

Factory

Acts

to

enable

the

Inspectors

to

prevent

illegal

working,

now

becoming

very

prevalent.\"

144Children

of

the

age

of

8

years

and

upwards,

have,indeed,

been

employed

from

6

a.m.

to

9

p.m.

during

the

last

half

year

in

my

district.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1857,p.

39.)

145\"The

Printworks'

Act

is

admitted

to

be

a

failure

both

with

reference

to

its

educational

and

protective

provisions.\"(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1862,

p.

52.)

146Thus,

e.g.,

E.

Potter

in

a

letter

to

the

Times

of

March

24th,

1863.

The

Times

reminded

him

of

the

maoufacturers'revolt

against

the

Ten

Hours'

Bill.

147Thus,

among

others,

Mr.

W.

Newmarch,

collaborator

and

editor

of

Tooke's

\"History

of

Prices.\"

Is

it

a

scientific

advance

to

make

cowardly

concessions

to

public

opinion

148The

Act

passed

in

1860,

determined

that,

in

regard

to

dye

and

bleachworks,

the

working

day

should

be

fixed

on

August

1st,

1861,

provisionally

at

12

hours,

and

definitely

on

August

1st,

1862,

at

10

hours,

i.e.,

at

10

hours

for

ordinary

days,

and

7

for

Saturday.

Now,

when

the

fatal

year,

1862,came,

the

old

farce

was

repeated.

Besides,

the

manufacturers

petitioned

Parliament

to

allow

the

employment

of

young

persons

and

women

for

12

hours

during

one

year

longer.\"In

the

existing

condition

of

the

trade

(the

time

of

the

cotton

famine),

it

was

greatly

to

the

advantage

of

the

operatives

to

work

12

hours

per

day,

and

make

wages

when

they

could.\"

A

bill

to

this

effect

had

been

brought

in,

\"and

it

was

mainly

due

to

the

action

of

the

operative

bleachers

in

Scotland

that

the

bill

was

abandoned.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1862,

pp.

1415.)

Thus

defeated

by

the

very

workpeople,

in

whose

name

it

pretended

to

speak,

Capital

discovered,

with

the

help

of

lawyer

spectacles,

that

the

Act

of

1860,

drawn

up,

like

all

the

Acts

of

Parliament

for

the

\"protection

of

labour,\"

in

equivocal

phrases,gave

them

a

pretext

to

exclude

from

its

working

the

calenderers

and

finishers.

English

jurisprudence,

ever

the

faithful

servant

of

capital,

sanctioned

in

the

Court

of

Common

Pleas

this

piece

of

pettifogging.

\"The

operatives

have

been

greatly

disappointed...

they

have

complained

of

over-work,

and

it

is

greatly

to

be

regretted

that

the

clear

intention

of

the

legislature

should

have

failed

by

reason

of

a

faulty

definition.\"

(l.c.,

p.

18.)

149The

\"open-air

bleachers\"

had

evaded

the

law

of

1860,

by

means

of

the

lie

that

no

women

worked

at

it

in

the

night.

The

lie

was

exposed

by

the

Factory

Inspectors,

and

at

the

same

time

Parliament

was,

by

petitions

from

the

operatives,

bereft

of

its

notions

as

to

the

cool

meadow-fragrance,

in

which

bleaching

in

the

open-air

was

reported

to

take

place.

In

this

aerial

bleaching,drying-rooms

were

used

at

temperatures

of

from

90°

to

100°Fahrenheit,

in

which

the

work

was

done

for

the

most

part

by

girls.

\"Cooling\"

is

the

technical

expression

for

their

occasional

escape

from

the

drying-rooms

into

the

fresh

air.

\"Fifteen

girls

in

stoves.

Heat

from

80°

to

90°

for

linens,

and

100°

and

upwards

for

cambrics.

Twelve

girls

ironing

and

doing-up

in

a

small

room

about

10

feet

square,

in

the

centre

of

which

is

a

close

stove.

The

girls

stand

round

the

stove,

which

throws

out

a

terrific

heat,

and

dries

the

cambrics

rapidly

for

the

ironers.

The

hours

of

work

for

these

hands

are

unlimited.

If

busy,

they

work

till

9

or

12

at

night

for

successive

nights.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1862,

p.

56.)

A

medical

man

states:

\"No

special

hours

are

allowed

for

cooling,

but

if

the

temperature

gets

too

high,

or

the

workers'

hands

get

soiled

from

perspiration,

they

are

allowed

to

go

out

for

a

few

minutes....

My

experience,

which

is

considerable,

in

treating

the

diseases

of

stove

workers,

compels

me

to

express

the

opinion

that

their

sanitary

condition

is

by

no

means

so

high

as

that

of

the

operatives

in

a

spinning

factory

(and

Capital,

in

its

memorials

to

Parliament,

had

painted

them

as

floridly

healthy

after

the

manner

of

Rubens.)

The

diseases

most

observable

amongst

them

are

phthisis,

bronchitis,

irregularity

of

uterine

functions,

hysteria

in

its

most

aggravated

forms,

and

rheumatism.

All

of

these,

I

believe,

are

either

directly

or

indirectly

induced

by

the

impure,

overheated

air

of

the

apartments

in

which

the

hands

are

employed

and

the

want

of

sufficient

comfortable

clothing

to

protect

them

from

the

cold,

damp

atmosphere,

in

winter,

when

going

to

their

homes.\"

(l.c.,

pp.

56-57.)

The

Factory

Inspectors

remarked

on

the

supplementary

law

of

1860,

torn

from

these

open-air

bleachers:

\"The

Act

has

not

only

failed

to

afford

that

protection

to

the

workers

which

it

appears

to

offer,

but

contains

a

clause

...

apparently

so

worded

that,

unless

persons

are

detected

working

after

8

o'clock

at

night

they

appear

to

come

under

no

protective

provisions

at

all,

and

if

they

do

so

work

the

mode

of

proof

is

so

doubtful

that

a

conviction

can

scarcely

follow.\"

(l.c.,

p.

52.)

\"To

all

intents

and

purposes,

therefore,

as

an

Act

for

any

benevolent

or

educational

purpose,

it

is

a

failure;

since

it

can

scarcely

be

called

benevolent

to

permit,

which

is

tantamount

to

compelling,

women

and

children

to

work

14

hours

a

day

with

or

without

meals,

as

the

case

may

be,

and

perhaps

for

longer

hours

than

these,

without

limit

as

to

age,

without

reference

to

sex,

and

without

regard

to

the

social

habits

of

the

families

of

the

neighbourhood,

in

which

such

works

(bleaching

and

dyeing)

are

situated.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

30th

April,

1863,

p.

40.)

150Note

to

the

2nd

Ed.

Since

1866,

when

I

wrote

the

above

passages,

a

reaction

has

again

set

in.

151\"The

conduct

of

each

of

these

classes

(capitalists

and

workmen)

has

been

the

result

of

the

relative

situation

in

which

they

have

been

placed.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1848,p.

113.)

152\"The

employments,

placed

under

restriction,

were

connected

with

the

manufacture

of

textile

fabrics

by

the

aid

of

steam

or

water-power.

There

were

two

conditions

to

which

an

employment

must

be

subject

to

cause

it

to

be

inspected,

viz.,the

use

of

steam

or

waterpower,

and

the

manufacture

of

certain

specified

fibre.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

October,

1864,

p.

8.)

153On

the

condition

of

so-called

domestic

industries,specially

valuable

materials

are

to

be

found

in

the

latest

reports

of

the

Children's

Employment

Commission.

154\"The

Acts

of

last

Session

(1864)

...

embrace

a

diversity

of

occupations,

the

customs

in

which

differ

greatly,

and

the

use

of

mechanical

power

to

give

motion

to

machinery

is

no

longer

one

of

the

elements

necessary,

as

formerly,

to

constitute,

in

legal

phrase,

a

'Factory.'\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

Octaber,

1864,p.

8.)

155Belgium,

the

paradise

of

Continental

Liberalism,

shows

no

trace

of

this

movement.

Even

in

the

coal

and

metal

mines

labourers

of

both

sexes,

and

all

ages,

are

consumed,

in

perfect\"freedom\"

at

any

period

and

through

any

length

of

time.

Of

every

1,000

persons

employed

there,

733

are

men,

88

women,135

boys,

and

44

girls

under

16;

in

the

blast

furnaces,

&c.,of

every

1,000,

668

are

men,

149

women,

98

boys,

and

85

girls

under

16.

Add

to

this

the

low

wages

for

the

enormous

exploitation

of

mature

and

immature

labour-power.

The

average

daily

pay

for

a

man

is

2s.

8d.,

for

a

woman,

1s.

8d.,

for

a

boy,

1s.

2d.

As

a

result,

Belgium

had

in

1863,

as

compared

with

1850,

nearly

doubled

both

the

amount

and

the

value

of

its

exports

of

coal,

iron,

&c.

156Robert

Owen,

soon

after

1810,

not

only

maintained

the

necessity

of

a

limitation

of

the

working

day

in

theory,

but

actually

introduced

the

10

hours'

day

into

his

factory

at

New

Lanark.

This

was

laughed

at

as

a

communistic

Utopia;

so

were

his

\"Combination

of

children's

education

with

productive

labour

and

the

Co-operative

Societies

of

Workingmen\",

first

called

into

being

by

him.

To-day,

the

first

Utopia

is

a

Factory

Act,

the

second

figures

as

an

official

phrase

in

all

Factory

Acts,

the

third

is

already

being

used

as

a

cloak

for

reactionary

humbug.

157Ure:

\"French

translation,

Philosophie

des

Manufactures.\"Paris,

1836,

Vol.

II,

pp.

39,

40,

67,

77,

&c.

158In

the

Compte

Rendu

of

the

International

Statistical

Congress

at

Paris,

1855,

it

is

stated:

\"The

French

law,

which

limits

the

length

of

daily

labour

in

factories

and

workshops

to

12

hours,

does

not

confine

this

work

to

definite

fixed

hours.For

children's

labour

only

the

work-time

is

prescribed

as

between

5

a.m.

and

9

p.m.

Therefore,

some

of

the

masters

use

the

right

which

this

fatal

silence

gives

them

to

keep

their

works

going,

without

intermission,

day

in,

day

out,

possibly

with

the

exception

of

Sunday.

For

this

purpose

they

use

two

different

sets

of

workers,

of

whom

neither

is

in

the

workshop

more

than

12

hours

at

a

time,

but

the

work

of

the

establishment

lasts

day

and

night.

The

law

is

satisfied,

but

is

humanity\"

Besides

\"the

destructive

influence

of

night-labour

on

the

human

organism,\"stress

is

also

laid

upon

\"the

fatal

influence

of

the

association

of

the

two

sexes

by

night

in

the

same

badly-lighted

workshops.\"

159\"For

instance,

there

is

within

my

district

one

occupier

who,

within

the

same

curtilage,

is

at

the

same

time

a

bleacher

and

dyer

under

the

Bleaching

and

Dyeing

Works

Act,

a

printer

under

the

Print

Works

Act,

and

a

finisher

under

the

Factory

Act.\"

(Report

of

Mr.

Baker,

in

Reports,

lic.,

for

October

31st,1861,

p.

20.)

After

enumerating

the

different

provisions

of

these

Acts,

and

the

complications

arising

from

them,

Mr.

Baker

says:

\"It

will

hence

appear

that

it

must

be

very

difficult

to

secure

the

execution

of

these

three

Acts

of

Parliament

where

the

occupier

chooses

to

evade

the

law.\"

But

what

is

assured

to

the

lawyers

by

this

is

law-suits.

160Thus

the

Factory

Inspectors

at

last

venture

to

say:\"These

objections

(of

capital

to

the

legal

limitation

of

the

working

day)

must

succumb

before

the

broad

principle

of

the

rights

of

labour....

There

is

a

time

when

the

master's

right

in

his

workman's

labour

ceases,

and

his

time

becomes

his

own,

even

if

there

were

no

exhaustion

in

the

question.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31

st

Oct.,

1862,

p.

54.)

161\"We,

the

workers

of

Dunkirk,

declare

that

the

length

of

time

of

labour

required

under

the

present

system

is

too

great,

and

that,

far

from

leaving

the

worker

time

for

rest

and

education,

it

plunges

him

into

a

condition

of

servitude

but

little

better

than

slavery.

That

is

why

we

decide

that

8

hours

are

enough

for

a

working

day,

and

ought

to

be

legally

recognised

as

enough;

why

we

call

to

our

help

that

powerful

lever,

the

press;

...

and

why

we

shall

consider

all

those

that

refuse

us

this

help

as

enemies

of

the

reform

of

labour

and

of

the

rights

of

the

labourer.\"

(Resolution

of

the

Working

Men

of

Dunkirk,

New

York

State,

1866.)

162Reports,

&c.,

for

Oct.,

1848,

p.

112.

163\"The

proceedings

(the

manoeuvres

of

capital,

e.g.,

from

1848-50)

have

afforded,

moreover,

incontrovertible

proof

of

the

fallacy

of

the

assertion

so

often

advanced,

that

operatives

need

no

protection,

but

may

be

considered

as

free

agents

in

the

disposal

of

the

only

property

which

they

possess

the

labour

of

their

hands

and

the

sweat

of

their

brows.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

April

30th,

1850,

p.

45.)

\"Free

labour

(if

so

it

may

be

termed)

even

in

a

free

country,

requires

the

strong

arm

of

the

law

to

protect

it.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

October

31st,

1864,

p.

34.)

\"To

permit,

which

is

tantamount

to

compelling

...

to

work

14

hours

a

day

with

or

without

meals,\"

&c.

(Repts.,

&c.,

for

April

30th,1863,

p.

40.)

164Friedrich

Engels,

l.c.,

p.

5.

165The

10

Hours'

Act

has,

in

the

branches

of

industry

that

come

under

it,

\"put

an

end

to

the

premature

decrepitude

of

the

former

long-hour

workers.\"

(Reports,

&c.,

for

31st

Oct.,

1859,p.

47.)

\"Capital

(in

factories)

can

never

be

employed

in

keeping

the

machinery

in

motion

beyond

a

limited

time,

without

certain

injury

to

the

health

and

morals

of

the

labourers

employed;

and

they

are

not

in

a

position

to

protect

themselves.\"

(l.c.,

p.

8)

166\"A

still

greater

boon

is

the

distinction

at

last

made

clear

between

the

worker's

own

time

and

his

master's.

The

worker

knows

now

when

that

which

he

sells

is

ended,

and

when

his

own

begins;

and

by

possessing

a

sure

foreknowledge

of

this,

is

enabled

to

prearrange

his

own

minutes

for

his

own

purposes.\"(l.c.,

p.

52.)

\"By

making

them

masters

of

their

own

time(the

Factory

Acts)

have

given

them

a

moral

energy

which

is

directing

them

to

the

eventual

possession

of

political

power\"(l.c.,

p.

47).

With

suppressed

irony,

and

in

very

well

weighed

words,

the

Factory

Inspectors

hint

that

the

actual

law

also

frees

the

capitalist

from

some

of

the

brutality

natural

to

a

man

who

is

a

mere

embodiment

of

capital,

and

that

it

has

given

him

time

for

a

little

\"culture.\"

\"Formerly

the

master

had

no

time

for

anything

but

money;

the

servant

had

no

time

for

anything

but

labour\"

(l.c.,

p.

48).

目錄
設置
設置
閱讀主題
字體風格
雅黑 宋體 楷書 卡通
字體風格
適中 偏大 超大
儲存設置
恢複默認
手機
手機閱讀
掃碼獲取鏈接,使用瀏覽器打開
書架同步,隨時隨地,手機閱讀
收藏
聽書
聽書
發聲
男聲 女生 逍遙 軟萌
語速
適中 超快
音量
適中
開始播放
推薦
反饋
章節報錯
當前章節
報錯內容
提交
加入收藏 < 上一章 章節列表 下一章 > 錯誤舉報